Scientific

Deliverables :

• Subsequent to one review cycle ending, evaluate incoming applications for completeness and accuracy.
• Generate accurate and succinct summary statements that reflect the discussion of each application under review, including major score-driven strengths and weaknesses.
• Ensure that post-meeting reports and documents are compiled and edited to produce high-quality documents.
• Work with staff to identify and coordinate the participation of reviewers for applications received by the SRB.
• Identify and select reviewers by matching the expertise of the reviewer with the applications' content while also balancing appropriate demographic considerations such as gender, minority, geographic region, and institution type distributions among the review panel.

Work Details :

• Complete the administrative review of grant applications for completeness and compliance with the Notice of Funding Opportunity (NOFO) 1
• Schedule review meetings; prepare materials for reviewers. 2
• Interact and coordinate review activities with SRB staff, such as preparing review meeting materials and accomplishing tasks in an orderly and efficient manner. 3
• Performs administrative review of research grant applications.
• Provide the application, reviewer, and meeting-specific recommendations for consideration by the Scientific Review Officer and staff.
• As requested, correspond with potential reviewers and complete recruitment of the review panel.
• Implement administrative flexibilities under the supervision of the SRB Section Chief, for example, by managing the process of splitting Special Emphasis Panels (SEPs), if needed.
• Identifies specific areas of expertise for the peer review panel, searches databases and resources, and prepares lists of potential reviewers.
• Evaluate grant applications to identify areas of expertise required for peer review.
• Prepare clear written meeting documents and materials that contain accurate information, such as deadlines, review policies, materials, and instructions for reviewers.
• Prepares preliminary drafts of summary statements.
• Use systems such as Committee Management (CMM), Peer Review, QVR, and Internet Assisted Review (IAR) to perform review-related tasks such as adding reviewers to rosters, enabling reviewers, preparing summary statements, adding meeting and post-submission material, and setting up meeting phases.
• Work with the review meeting's SRO / Designated Federal Official (DFO) to ensure an appropriate understanding of the review meeting status and topics that need special attention, such as managing reviewer attendance, late critiques and preliminary scores, potential Conflict of Interest (COIs), reviewer assignments and workload, and issues that may impact the discussion order of applications.
• Draft Resume / Summary of the discussion based on the discussion notes from the meeting.
• Format critiques to SRB standard practices.
• Validates and enters information into databases.
• Collaborate with staff on the preparation and evaluation (pre-publication) of NOFOs to ensure internal NIGMS and
• SRB consistency and adherence to both NIH policy and NIGMS programmatic requirements.
• Work with staff on the entry of reviewer and meeting data into the CMM, Peer Review, QVR, and IAR Systems.
• Identifies involved persons who must be on a conflict of interest list and identifies deficiencies which must be addressed prior to review.
• Assess reviewers against applications for potential conflicts of interest.
• Attends peer review meetings to take notes for use when preparing a final summary of the documentation of meeting proceedings.
• Schedule and facilitate pre-review meetings to orient reviewers and NIH staff to the policy, procedures, expectations, and requirements of the review meeting.
• Obtains written critiques from reviewers.
• Upload appropriate critique template to match the NOFO specified review criteria (if applicable).
• Set deadlines in IAR for reviewers to submit critiques and monitor their receipt.
• Follow up with assigned reviewers to ensure they meet critique submission deadlines.
• Evaluate incoming reviews for completeness and accuracy.
• Complete additional actions and requests related to application review, such as late application submissions and acceptance of post-submission materials.
• Analyzes scientific content of grant applications.
• Stay abreast of scientific advances in relevant fields and laws, regulations, and policies related to COI, review criteria, human subject protections and inclusion, animal welfare, and other relevant factors related to NIH peer review.
• Mentors and trains staff on scientific peer review processes and procedures.
• Mentors and coaches peer reviewers in the performance of reviews.

Minimum Education :

Additional Qualifications :

Certifications & Licenses : Field of Study :

• Chemistry
• Biochemical Sciences
• Biology
• Microbiology
• Molecular Biology
• Neuroscience
• Genetics
• Biomedical
• Engineering
• Pharmacology
• Physiology
• Community and Public Health
Software :
• Outlook
• Outlook
• Microsoft Teams
• Microsoft Office

Skills :

• Communication Skills (Oral & Written)
• Scientific Writing and Editorial Skills
• Peer Review Process for Grants

Last updated : 2024-05-04