Subscribe for free: compensation & pay equity law review
You'll receive a weekly newsletter email with the most important legal news on compensation and pay equity. We handle your contact details in line with our Privacy Policy
Editor's Note
Massachusetts Pay Reporting And Why It's Great
Employers are generally against news employment laws, particularly if they require some work. That's fair. But what if the work is more than just work? What if it helped solve a problem?
Pay equity is not a compliance hassle; it's about fundamental fairness. When two employees are doing the same work, they should be paid the same. This should not be controversial. And when there are good business reasons for paying people differently, it's not a pay equity problem. Nobody is trying to change that.
What regulators want is to change is the fact that we have not made significant progress on pay equity in 30 years. Why? It's complicated, but mostly has to do with outdated concepts of men as "the breadwinner" along with cultural tensions about gender roles, race, religion, and national origin.
But here's the thing. Pay equity is the right thing. And it's not hard. It's mostly just data and math. And computers are awesome at data and math. And regulators have computers and math; they just need some data.
Here's the other thing. The data the regulators are asking for is pay data in the EEO-1 job categories, which are pretty general. It won't tell anybody that you have pay discrimination issues because it's not specific enough. It will likely raise questions though because we haven't made progress in 30 years and everyone has pay gaps. If the idea were to enforce pay equity laws against everyone, it wouldn't work. I don't think that's what states and the EEOC is look for anyway. They would rather reduce and eliminate pay discrimination.
Requiring employers to report pay data, forces them toward doing pay equity audits to identify their gaps and fix them.
And if employers do that, they will be in compliance, reduce their risk, and pay people fairly based on their actual work and qualifications.
Sometime, math and statistics really can solve problems. Who knew?
Here's everything you need to know about pay reporting in Massachusetts. Do your pay equity audit now so you understand what it says and have time to address any issues before February 2025.
- Heather Bussing
Employer FAQ: Massachusetts’s New Pay Transparency And Pay Data Reporting Requirements
by Delaney Busch and Natalie Groot
at Mintz
Massachusetts has passed into law An Act Relative to Salary Range Transparency (the “Act”), which means that pay transparency and pay data reporting requirements will soon become official. In advance of the effective dates in 2025, covered businesses must understand and prepare for new compliance obligations.
We previously wrote about this Act in its legislation phase here. In addition, information regarding other jurisdictions requiring wage transparency, such as California, New York, and Washington, are available in our previous articles here and here.
Pay Transparency
Private and public employers with at least twenty-five (25) employees in Massachusetts are covered under the Act. However, questions remain regarding the threshold calculation of “employees.” For example, the law does not address whether a hybrid employee, i.e., an employee working a hybrid schedule that includes periodic remote work from Massachusetts, would be included in the employee count.
The Act requires employers to include the “annual salary range or hourly wage range,” i.e., the “pay range” that the employer “reasonably and in good faith expects to pay for such position” at the time of posting, in all postings. Postings are not required to include other compensation information, such as bonuses, commissions, or benefits. The Act defines “posting” as “any advertisement or job posting intended to recruit job applicants for a particular and specific employment position”. This includes any recruitment by the employer or a third party on the employer’s behalf. Although not expressly stated, the definition of posting may also include informal or private postings, such as a post on social media sites by an employer or an employee about job opportunities at an employer, as it is directed at “any advertisement or job posting intended to recruit” applicants for a specific role. Applicants may also request the pay range information regarding a particular position.
Further, the Act prohibits an employer from retaliating or discriminating against any employee or applicant for taking “action to enforce their rights” under this portion of the law (e.g., by requesting the pay range of the applicant’s prospective position or the employee’s current position), “mak[ing] a complaint” regarding the employer to the employer or to the Attorney General regarding an alleged violation, or participating in any proceeding or testimony regarding any alleged violation by an employer.
This portion of the law goes into effect on July 31, 2025.
No, the Act does not contain a general notification requirement. Covered employers are, however, required to disclose pay range information to existing employees if:
The Act does not create a private right of action, but it does provide the Attorney General with exclusive authority over noncompliance. The Act also allows the Attorney General to seek and obtain injunctive or declaratory relief, as well as statutory penalties, if an employer fails to comply. The Act does limit the statutory penalties (starting with a warning for a first offense and increasing to fines of up to $25,000 for a fourth or subsequent offense) and makes plain that a violation of the Act is not akin to a violation of the Wage Act, and therefore does not carry treble damages.
Pay Data Reporting
The Act mandates that employers with at least 100 employees in Massachusetts at any time during the prior calendar year who are already subject to federal EEO disclosures (either EEO-1, EEO-3, EEO-4 or EEO-5 reporting requirements) must also file a wage data report (annually or, for certain categories of employers, biannually) with the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Executive Office of Labor and Workforce Development will publish aggregated reports on its website.
This portion of the law goes into effect on February 1, 2025. At that time, employers must submit their first round of EEO and pay data to the Commonwealth.
The wage data report includes workforce demographic and pay data information categorized by race, ethnicity, sex and job category. The submission can be in the same form as the federal EEO report.
Next Steps
Even though the Act does not take effect until next year (with pay data reporting requirements due on February 1, 2025 and pay range disclosure required on July 31, 2025), employers should begin developing comprehensive compensation strategies now to ensure compliance with the Act.
In consultation with counsel, covered business can begin taking these steps:
[View source.]
You'll receive a weekly newsletter email with the most important legal news on compensation and pay equity. We handle your contact details in line with our Privacy Policy
CompAnalyst® Pay Equity Suite can help you achieve and sustain pay equity