Salary.com Compensation & Pay Equity Law Review

State AGs are Pushing Back on DEI

Newsletter volume 3.10

Licensed and published by JD Supra

March 05, 2025

Editor's Note

State AGs are Pushing Back on DEI

Sixteen attorneys general have come out to say what the employment lawyers have been saying all along. DEI is still legal. And discrimination is still illegal.

But the executive branch is ignoring both law and court orders. That means that having a complete legal defense may not save you from investigations, harassment, lies, and other completely unwarranted attacks by people with power to harm you.

This article from Fisher Phillips offers solid advice. Doing a privileged DEI audit is also important for at least mitigating risk.

But how you handle what's going on may be more about survival than risk management. There are some organizations that are standing firm on DEI in very public ways because they know it's good business.

Some are going silent because they don't want to be a target for harassment. This is a very real concern. Dealing with "investigations" by people who do not care about either the facts or the law is expensive, exhausting, and exasperating. For some companies, sitting quietly on the sidelines is a necessity, not a nice to have.

What's important is what organizations DO, not what they say about DEI. There are a lot of organizations out there that will continue to hire and promote great people, promote equity, and foster a discrimination and harassment free workplace. This is the right approach no matter what public stance companies take.

A lot of what's still happening is designed to create fear and promote prejudice. The threats are not realistic because the administration is firing all the people who would do the work. There aren't people or resources to follow through with most of the threats. It doesn't mean they won't pick some companies and try it. But we should be able to get a clearer read on what the realistic risk of being targeted is fairly soon.

For now, the best thing companies can do is stay in business, take care of their people, and weather the storm as best they can. That's going to look different for everyone. So get the facts before you judge and have compassion for people facing these challenges. I am sending strength and love to all the HR, Legal, PR, and Comms professionals dealing with this.

In an environment of misinformation and chaos look beyond the bluster and watch what people actually do.

- Heather Bussing

States Take Stand Against Trump’s Anti-DEI Actions: What Employers Need to Know

by Sheila Abron, Regina Petty, and Jennifer Sandberg

at Fisher Phillips

Sixteen Democratic state attorneys general just issued joint guidance reaffirming their position that workplace diversity, equity, inclusion (DEI) initiatives remain legal – and important to the modern workplace. The February 13 guidance, signed by AGs from traditionally “blue” states such as Massachusetts, Illinois, California, and New York, directly responds to the Trump administration’s recent executive orders and other actions taking aim at corporate DEI programs. The AGs’ message is clear: Well-structured DEI programs remain lawful and play a crucial role in fostering fair, compliant, and productive workplaces. This article breaks down the guidance, its implications for employers, and recommended next steps.

What the AGs Letter Says

The letter, issued by Andrea Joy Campbell (Mass.) and Kwame Raoul (Ill.), serves as both a legal clarification and a practical guide for employers. You can read the guidance here, but key points include:

  • DEI Programs Are Legal: The AGs reiterate that DEI initiatives designed to create inclusive work environments are consistent with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and state-level anti-discrimination laws, and are therefore legal. Courts have long recognized that monitoring demographic trends and ensuring equal opportunity is not discriminatory – so long as it is done properly and carefully.
  • Clarifying Misconceptions: The AGs argue that recent federal executive orders inaccurately portray all DEI programs as unlawful. They emphasize the difference between illegal actions – like quotas, preferences, workforce balancing – and lawful practices – such as broad outreach efforts, anti-bias training, and the use of data to identify potential disparities.
  • Business Benefits: The letter highlights evidence that diverse, inclusive workplaces perform better, with lower turnover, stronger innovation, and greater market competitiveness. “Promoting a diverse and inclusive workforce isn’t just the right thing to do,” the letter says, “it’s also more profitable.”

Why the AGs Issued This Guidance

The AGs’ letter follows recent White House executive orders instructing federal agencies to investigate private-sector DEI practices for potential violations. While these orders have generated uncertainty, the AGs contend that they don’t change existing anti-discrimination laws.

The February 13 letter seeks to reassure employers that legal, well-structured DEI programs remain permissible. In fact, the AGs stress that businesses often have an affirmative duty to monitor workforce demographics to prevent discrimination – and that properly created DEI programs can mitigate legal risks in potential investigations.

State-Federal Tensions May Increase

While federal enforcement may rise, states with supportive AGs are likely to defend employers adhering to best practices. Meanwhile, we have already seen actions taken by conservative state attorneys general taking aim at private employers’ DEI programs, and last week’s letter from the Democratic AGs will not slow down those efforts. Multistate employers should track both federal developments and evolving state-level positions to navigate the fine line between these positions.

What Employers Should Expect

The AGs have pledged ongoing support for businesses maintaining lawful DEI programs. As federal scrutiny increases, you should expect:

  • Increased State Agency Attention: Particularly for companies with federal contracts.
  • Further State-Level Guidance: Other states may follow the lead of these 16 AGs – while we can expect opposing states to issue their own contrary version in the near future.
  • Evolving Best Practices: Regularly review policies to align with both developing federal requirements and state-level protections.

Recommended Next Steps for Employers

  • Audit and Adjust Policies: Review your DEI programs to ensure compliance with federal and state law. If necessary, add language demonstrating that your company does not enforce quotas or identity-based preferences, as those have always been illegal under federal law and never should have existed in the first place.
  • Document Compliance Efforts: Maintain records of DEI-related decisions and their business justifications. Track training participation and demographic monitoring practices.
  • Review Your DEI Training Programs: If you offer training on unconscious bias, inclusive leadership, or legal DEI parameters, make sure your trainers explain DEI goals in clear, lawful terms – or consider using well trained professional trainers that know the legal landscape.
  • Communicate Consistently: Update internal messaging to reflect a commitment to both fairness and legal compliance. Reassure employees that DEI efforts aim to create opportunity for all, not favoritism for any specific group or groups.
  • Stay Informed: Read our What Businesses Need to Know About DEI in the Trump Era: FAQs for Employers Insight.
  • Utilize Attorney-Client Privilege: Review your DEI and related programs with your experienced DEI attorney to receive the benefit of attorney-client privilege.

Subscribe for free: compensation & pay equity law review

Are you concerned about pay gaps in your organization?

CompAnalyst® Pay Equity Suite can help you achieve and sustain pay equity

It's easy to get started

Transform compensation at your organization and get pay right — see how with a personalized demo.
See it in action