Blog
Get Pay Right on ADP Workforce Now® Next Gen™
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Written by Salary.com Staff
July 10, 2026
Performance review processes are critical for shaping employee careers, rewards, and the organizational culture. Yet if not managed correctly, their outcome can dramatically differ from department to department. A calibration session is a calibration process implemented within the HR function to ensure all ratings are consistent and to minimize any potential legal issues.
A calibration session is a process in which managers, HR representatives, and company leaders review and calibrate the performance ratings of the employees in the department. These calibration meetings ensure every department has the same value for a "meets expectations" employee rating.
| Element | Description |
|---|---|
| Purpose | To align performance ratings from departments and eliminate any inconsistencies in the application of those ratings. |
| Participants | Managers, HR representatives, and company leaders. |
| Output | The final, equitable performance ratings for the employees in the company. |
| Timing | After managers complete their performance rating for their employees and before the managers notify the employees of the ratings. |
| Common Tools | Tools Rating scales, nine box grids, calibration templates, and distribution models can be used during these sessions. |
Companies use calibration sessions to ensure that all employees, including direct reports across every level of the organization, are on a level playing field.
When evaluating agent performance and the contributions of each team member, managers may unconsciously and subconsciously rate the performance of their employees based on their relationship with the employees or other factors that have nothing to do with the employees' actual performance.
The calibration forces all managers to use the same standard when evaluating employees, ensuring that everyone is evaluated fairly.
High performing HR teams implement five points during performance calibration sessions for employees. These five points are as follows:
Consistency of the ratings being applied to all departments.
Differentiation between high performing, average, and poor performing employees within each department.
Basis for checking for biases within the management teams.
Presentation of evidence to back the performance ratings assigned to each employee.
Alignment between employee performance and performance expectations with the outcomes that the company values.
Successful calibration sessions depend on objective data and clearly defined standards. CompAnalyst® helps organizations support those discussions with market benchmarks, compensation analytics, and salary structures that promote consistency and fairness across departments.
Managerial bias is a serious concern that can cloud the presentation of an accurate performance review of each team member. During the calibration, all managers must present the reasons for the performance ratings that they have assigned to the employees in their departments. A manager who rates all of their employees as high performing will have to present this to other managers in the room.
A study published in the Harvard Business Review found that more than 60 percent of an employee's rating within a performance review session can be the result of the tendencies of the manager to rate those employees.
The performance rating of each employee will inform key decisions within the organization regarding that employee. The HR team will use these ratings to make decisions regarding compensation, promotions, and training for employees.
What happens after a successful calibration can include the following steps within the company:
The HR team finalizes the ratings and locks them into the HRIS software platform.
The company's compensation team will use the ratings to determine earned merit increases and bonuses.
The managers will use the performance ratings to have a performance conversation and schedule coaching sessions with each of their employees.
The HR department will use the performance ratings to identify high potential employees for training and development or succession planning within the company.
Organizations often need a structured way to translate calibrated performance ratings into actual pay decisions. CompXL® helps compensation teams automate merit increases, bonuses, commissions, and reward planning.
The performance ratings will determine the company's merit based pay for each employee. Most compensation structures use the performance rating of the employee as a factor in determining merit increases in salary, bonuses, or other forms of compensation.
Rating inflation is when the managers rate a high percentage of their team members as meeting the criteria for high performance ratings. Rating compression is the opposite; a percentage of the employees in a department are given the same performance rating. These both can impact the compensation and promotions for employees within that department.
Companies can spot and correct rating inflation and compression by taking the following steps:
Reviewing the performance of each department to spot inflation and compression.
Working with the managers of departments with inflated or compressed ratings to reassign performance ratings as necessary.
Using a guided distribution model to ensure a percentage of each department is given specific performance ratings.
Requiring that each manager provides examples of the performance of their employees to support any rating changes.
Calibration sessions require preparation on the part of the HR team. HR teams that do not have supporting data to present at the session will likely find themselves in political discussions with the managers of the companies.
Some of the best practices for conducting a calibration session can include the following steps for the HR department:
Sharing the performance rating summaries with all management and HR staff at least three days prior to the session.
Establishing ground rules for the calibration to minimize conflicts between department managers.
Using a nine box grid to map out employees according to their performance level and potential.
Having a neutral facilitator to conduct and manage the calibration.
Documenting the decisions of the managers during the calibration.
The insights gained from tools like the nine box grid often guide employee development and succession planning. Elevate® gives employees and managers access to personalized information about compensation, rewards, and career paths.
A calibration facilitator is responsible for helping organizations effectively manage calibration sessions from start to finish. The facilitator will make sure that all managers are participating in the session, as well as that all of the performance ratings submitted by each manager are supported by evidence.
The nine box grid maps the performance of each employee according to two factors; the current level of their performance and their potential for future leadership roles within the company. Using the nine box grid, department managers can compare the performance of their employees to those outside of their departments.
There are pros and cons to each of these rating distribution methods that should be considered before use by the HR teams within the company.
| Method | Pros | Cons |
|---|---|---|
| Forced ranking | Creates clear differentiation | Damages collaboration and morale |
| Guided distribution | Balances fairness with flexibility | Requires strong facilitation |
| No curve | Preserves full manager autonomy | High risk of rating inflation |
Modern HR teams typically use guided distribution. The research study published in the Harvard Business Review that analyzed companies that utilized Deloitte found that the use of forced ranking models was associated with damaged employee relationships within the company.
Here are the frequent questions about the topic:
Calibration sessions can last between 90 minutes and three hours. Some companies hold these sessions over a few different days to accommodate managers from each department.
The managers of the employees, the HR representatives, and the company leaders should attend the calibration sessions. The employees themselves do not attend, and some companies include a representative for diversity and inclusion in their calibration.
Most companies hold calibration sessions once per year, when they evaluate the performance of each of their employees. Other companies that use a system of continuous performance management may conduct several calibration sessions throughout the year, calibrating their employees every quarter.
Performance reviews are the meetings between the manager and the employee in question. During these meetings, the manager communicates the employee's accomplishments during the review period and any other development goals for those employees.
Calibration sessions are the meetings held within the company between managers, HR representatives, and company leaders before the performance reviews between the managers and their employees.
During these sessions, the managers and HR representatives ensure that all performance ratings applied to the employees are consistent throughout the organization before the employees are made aware of those ratings.
The latest research, expert advice, and compensation best practices all in one place.
Blog
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Blog
Learn how to train managers for effective pay conversations and build trust.
Blog
Total rewards package flexibility lets employees choose what matters - pay, perks, and benefits tailored to their needs.