Blog
Get Pay Right on ADP Workforce Now® Next Gen™
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Written by Salary.com Staff
August 07, 2026
Setting pay without solid data is like navigating without a map. Companies that skip compensation surveys end up guessing at what competitive pay looks like. And that guesswork shows up later as turnover, pay equity complaints, or budgets that don't match market reality.
Those risks become even greater as employee expectations around fair pay continue to rise. In fact, SHRM reports that nearly 9 in 10 U.S. workers (87%) believe that paying current employees fairly should be the top priority for employers.
Meeting those expectations requires more than intuition. Compensation surveys give HR and comp teams the market data needed to build pay structures that are competitive, equitable, and aligned with business goals.
This guide covers what you need to know about compensation surveys, from choosing the right one to using the data to build a real pay strategy.
Here's what you will find in the chapters ahead:
Chapter I. What is a Compensation Survey?
Chapter II. How Compensation Surveys Work
Chapter III. How to Conduct a Compensation Survey
Chapter IV. Choosing and Using Compensation Survey Data
Chapter V. Compensation Surveys in a Changing Workplace
Chapter VI. FAQs
A compensation survey is a report that collects pay information from many organizations to compare salaries, bonuses, and benefits for similar jobs, industries, and locations.
Instead of using guesses or outdated pay data, it provides reliable market information based on actual employer data gathered using a consistent process. Compensation surveys typically include:
Salary ranges by job title and level
Bonuses and incentive pay
Pay differences by location
Industry pay trends and benchmarks
More and more organizations now use survey solutions like Compdata Max Survey to benchmark pay against the market and make more informed compensation decisions.
Compensation survey data helps organizations make informed decisions about hiring, pay, and employee retention. By using reliable market data, companies can offer competitive salaries while ensuring employees are paid fairly.
Comp surveys support several important activities, including:
Setting competitive pay: Organizations can compare their salary ranges to the market and adjust them as needed to attract and retain employees.
Creating fair compensation programs: Survey data helps ensure employees in similar roles are paid consistently and aligned with market rates.
Improving hiring and retention: Competitive compensation makes it easier to attract qualified candidates and reduces the risk of losing valuable employees.
Supporting salary decisions: Accurate market data provides a strong foundation for salary reviews, budgeting, and compensation planning.
Planning for the future: Organizations can use compensation trends to forecast payroll costs and design effective reward programs.
Salary surveys can be grouped into different types based on the information they collect. These include:
National compensation surveys
These surveys gather pay data from across the country to show overall compensation trends. For example, the National Compensation Survey (NCS), conducted by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS), provides information about wages and benefits nationwide. Organizations use these surveys to understand labor market conditions and support compensation planning.
Industry-specific salary surveys
These surveys focus on a particular industry and provide pay data for jobs commonly found in that field. Examples include nursing roles in healthcare or engineering positions in technology. They help companies compare their pay levels with those of others in the same industry.
Regional salary surveys
These surveys collect detailed compensation data from a specific location, such as a city, province, state, or region. They help employers ensure their pay rates match local market conditions and hiring trends.
Custom salary surveys
These surveys are designed for a single organization or a select group of companies. They are useful when standard surveys do not provide enough information for specialized positions or unique compensation needs. These surveys offer more targeted and detailed results.
Compensation survey results are only useful if the data behind them is accurate and reliable. Understanding how data is collected, checked, and analyzed helps explain why some surveys provide trustworthy market benchmarks while others do not.
Comp survey data starts with participating companies submitting their own pay information. This usually happens through a structured questionnaire or a direct data upload, where companies report salaries, bonuses, and other pay details for specific job codes that have already been defined by the survey provider.
The process is straightforward:
Companies match their jobs to survey jobs
Salary data is submitted for each matched job
Survey providers review the data for errors or inconsistencies
Results are combined and reported
Most surveys report percentiles rather than just averages. For example, a survey may show that the 25th percentile for a role is $65,000, the median is $72,000, and the 75th percentile is $80,000.
Percentiles help companies see where their pay falls in the market. They also provide a clearer picture than averages, which can be distorted by a small number of unusually high or low salaries.
Job matching is one of the most important parts of a compensation survey. To compare pay accurately, companies must match jobs based on what employees actually do, not just their job titles.
Good job matching considers:
Main responsibilities
Skills and experience required
Level of responsibility and decision-making authority
Reporting structure
For example, two employees may both have the title "Marketing Manager," but their roles can be very different depending on the size and structure of the company. A title alone does not guarantee that two jobs are comparable.
To help ensure accurate matches, survey providers include detailed job descriptions and benchmark information. CompAnalyst® Software also supports this process by matching jobs based on job content and responsibilities, not just titles.
Survey data is most useful when it is filtered to reflect a company's actual labor market. Most survey providers allow companies to narrow the data based on factors such as:
Company size
Industry or sector
Location
Revenue
Experience level
These filters help companies compare themselves to organizations that are more similar to their own. For example, a 200-employee company should not rely on pay data from much larger organizations with very different compensation practices.
At the same time, filtering too narrowly can create problems. If too few companies remain in the dataset, the results may become less reliable. The goal is to find a balance between relevance and having enough data to produce meaningful benchmarks.
Buying an existing survey isn't your only option. Many organizations run their own surveys when they need comprehensive data for specialized roles, specific locations, or competitors not covered by standard surveys. Here, we will walk you through how to do it:
Identify the purpose of the survey. Are you trying to see how your pay compares against the market? Check out competitor benefits? Evaluate your overall compensation program?
Your objectives determine which jobs, industries, and organizations to include. Focus on roles that have the greatest impact on retention, recruitment, or labor costs.
Create a questionnaire that captures all relevant compensation information, including base salary, bonuses and incentives, benefits, and equity or stock-based compensation.
You can use existing survey templates or software instead of building a survey from scratch. Choose a tool that fits your organization and industry.
Pick organizations that represent the jobs and industries you want to study. A diverse and relevant participant group helps ensure accurate results.
Some organizations are more willing to participate when they receive incentives such as access to survey findings or data sharing arrangements.
Gather information through online surveys, phone interviews, or direct data submissions. Maintain confidentiality throughout the process because participants are more likely to provide accurate information when they know their data will remain private.
You can also use trusted compensation databases, such as CompAnalyst® Software, to access verified market data and reduce the time required for data collection.
After collecting the data, use statistical methods to identify trends and patterns. Review percentiles as well as averages because extreme values can distort results.
Also consider geographic differences since compensation levels often vary by location and cost of living.
Present the findings in a clear and useful format. Charts and graphs help make key trends easier to understand.
A good report does not just present data; it explains what the results mean and what actions should be taken.
Share the results with stakeholders and gather feedback before making decisions. Comp surveys should be conducted regularly because labor markets change over time. Reviewing and updating compensation practices helps organizations stay competitive.
In a nutshell, whether you conduct your own survey or use a third-party provider, the value comes from how you use the data. If you're buying a survey instead of building one, the next chapter covers how to choose a reliable provider and apply the results correctly.
Once you understand how surveys work, the harder part is figuring out which ones are reliable and how to use their results correctly without making mistakes that waste the value of the data.
Not every survey provider offers the same quality or depth of data. A few factors separate reliable providers from weaker ones, and it's worth evaluating a provider carefully before building pay decisions on top of their numbers.
Make sure to look for:
A sample size large enough to be statistically reliable, especially for niche roles
Regular data updates, since old data leads to outdated pay decisions
Verified data submissions, not self-reported numbers that go unchecked
A strong job matching method with clear job descriptions
Coverage that matches the company's industry and location
One example of a provider that combines broad market coverage with detailed job level data is Salary.com's Compensation Survey. It gives HR teams a reliable foundation for benchmarking across industries and regions, without the need to stitch together multiple incompatible data sources.
Even good data can be used the wrong way. Many companies make similar mistakes when they first start using compensation surveys, usually by treating the data as more exact than it really is.
These include:
Using only one data source instead of checking several
Matching jobs by title instead of actual responsibilities
Ignoring location differences, especially for remote work
Using old data that no longer reflects the current market
Paying everyone at the median without considering company goals or budget
Another mistake is treating survey data as the final decision. In reality, it is just one input. Companies also need to consider internal fairness, employee retention, and what they can afford. Sometimes the market suggests a higher salary, but internal limits change the final number.
Overall, survey data shows what other companies pay, not what you must pay. It should guide decisions, not replace your compensation strategy.
Survey data is most useful when it is turned into salary ranges instead of single pay points.
A common approach is:
Set the midpoint of each range close to the market median
Build a minimum and maximum around it, usually about 20 to 40% spread
Adjust for location if employees are in different regions
Check internal fairness so similar roles are paid consistently
Solutions like CompAnalyst® Pay Equity Suite help companies check for unfair pay gaps before finalizing ranges. This step matters because even well-intentioned pay decisions can create legal and reputational risk if equity isn't checked before implementation.
Furthermore, pay ranges are not set once and forgotten. They need regular updates as market data and company needs change.
Remote work and tighter job markets have changed pay practices a lot. As a result, compensation surveys are no longer just an annual event. They're now updated and used on an ongoing basis.
Remote work has complicated compensation surveys in ways that didn't exist a decade ago. Companies now need to decide whether to pay based on a single national rate, a tiered geographic structure, or local market rates tied to where each employee actually lives.
Common approaches include:
National pay bands, where everyone in a role earns the same regardless of location
Geographic pay zones, where pay adjusts based on the cost of labor in different regions
Location-based individual pricing, where each employee's pay reflects their specific metro area
Survey data is important for setting these rules fairly. Without it, companies may overpay in low-cost areas or underpay in high-cost areas, which can cause retention issues.
A 2024 Pew Research Center survey found that 29% of U.S. workers are dissatisfied with their pay, with many citing wages not keeping pace with the cost of living as the top reason.
As pay transparency laws expand across states and cities, that kind of dissatisfaction becomes harder for companies to manage quietly. Employees can now see posted salary ranges and compare them directly to their own pay.
Because of this, comp survey data has become essential for setting accurate, defensible pay ranges. Here's what companies need to keep in mind:
Salary ranges must reflect real market data, not overly broad estimates.
Pay needs to stay consistent internally, since employees can compare similar roles publicly.
Survey data helps justify pay decisions if they're questioned or audited.
CompAnalyst® Software can help companies turn market data into ready-to-publish salary ranges, making it easier to meet transparency requirements and stay compliant.
Compensation data becomes outdated quickly, especially in fast-moving labor markets. Using surveys that are two or three years old can lead to pay ranges that no longer match current market rates.
Best practices around timing:
Update core compensation data at least once a year
Update more often for fast-changing roles like tech and healthcare
Adjust older data to reflect wage growth over time
Review pay when the labor market changes, not just on a fixed schedule
Companies that treat compensation surveys as an ongoing process stay closer to market pay. Those that don't often fall behind without noticing, until they see higher turnover or lost candidates.
Here are frequently asked questions about compensation survey:
Providers typically offer a "best fit" matching process based on job duties rather than title alone. If no close match exists, some companies use a blended approach, averaging data from two or three related benchmark jobs to estimate a reasonable range.
Yes. Most companies often use survey data to price new roles before they're filled, matching the planned responsibilities to the closest existing benchmark job rather than waiting until someone is hired to figure out fair pay.
A published survey is a standard report available to any participating or purchasing company. On the other hand, a custom salary survey is built specifically for one organization or a small group of companies, often used when standard job matches don't fit a unique business model or specialized workforce.
They apply to both. Many companies run annual pay reviews using updated survey data to check whether current employees have fallen behind market rates, not just to set offers for new hires.
It's common and often recommended to use multiple data sources, especially when one provider does not have enough data for a role. Many compensation teams compare two or three sources to confirm the numbers before making a final decision. Each source is used as input, not as the only answer.
How compensation technology fits into an overall business model
The latest research, expert advice, and compensation best practices all in one place.
Blog
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Blog
Learn how to train managers for effective pay conversations and build trust.
Blog
Total rewards package flexibility lets employees choose what matters - pay, perks, and benefits tailored to their needs.