Blog
Get Pay Right on ADP Workforce Now® Next Gen™
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Written by Salary.com Staff
May 29, 2026
A performance review is a process used by HR and team leaders to gauge how well an employee is contributing to the company. Performance reviews give HR professionals an opportunity to assess an employee's performance for that specific period. These reviews are critical for creating a healthy and competitive workforce in today's markets.
This guide will provide you with all the information you need to know about performance reviews, including tips on how to write them effectively.
A performance review, also known as performance evaluation, is a formal process in which managers assess how well an employee performed over a specific period. This can be used to determine what an employee accomplished during that time and to also highlight any areas where they might need to improve.
Performance reviews will allow HR professionals to give feedback to their employees to encourage them to improve in specific areas. Performance evaluations allow employees to feel motivated to meet the demands laid out by their managers and provide a positive working relationship between the different teams.
Performance reviews are an essential part of the performance management process. Performance management as a process involves providing feedback to employees on a regular basis to encourage them to meet their goals.
A formal review completes that process and allows managers to make notes on an employee's performance over the year.
As such, a performance evaluation creates focus and motivation for employees to achieve their goals. Without regular reviews, performance management systems lose much of their utility.
Employee performance evaluations play a critical role in the overall performance of the organization. If each employee performs well and meets the organization's goals, the organization will see significant success.
According to a McKinsey report, organizations that focus on improving people's performance outperform their competition 4.2 times as often, with 30% higher revenue growth.
A review involves several key components. These components ensure that the process and the outcome of the review are beneficial for the employees and the organization.
Clear performance goals set during the review period
Specific achievements during the review period
Areas of strength and areas for improvement
Future performance and goal setting
Overall rating
Using compensation benchmarking tools like CompAnalyst® helps HR teams align performance evaluations with accurate market data and consistent standards, ensuring that reviews are both objective and actionable.
Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) and Objectives and Key Results (OKRs) are two of the most common metrics used in reviews. KPIs are used to assess routine performance, while OKRs allow individuals to track specific, ambitious goals.
| Element | Purpose | Example in Review |
|---|---|---|
| KPIs | Track routine performance | Achieved 95% of quarterly sales quota |
| OKRs | Drive strategic objectives | Launched new process improving efficiency by 25% |
A competency framework for performance reviews allows HR departments to standardize the process and ensure fairness in the outcome. A framework allows managers to assess employees using clearly defined criteria and ensures that decisions are based on well-structured data.
There are several different methods used in conducting performance evaluations or reviews. Two of the most common methods are 360 Degree Feedback and Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS).
360 Degree Feedback involves collecting feedback from numerous individuals for a more comprehensive view of the employee's performance.
Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scale (BARS) uses specific behavioral examples as the basis for performance ratings.
| Method | Strengths | Best For |
|---|---|---|
| 360 Degree Feedback | Reduces single-rater bias | Leadership and team roles |
| BARS | Provides clear behavior examples | Roles needing objective ratings |
Including examples in a review gives managers a heads up about what to expect from writing the review. This is especially true for common aspects of performance evaluations, such as the focus on measurable outcomes.
Help to structure effective feedback and goals for the employee
Provide examples of how to highlight positive performance factors
Provide guidance on how to address areas of underperformance
Provide clear examples that managers can apply directly
Make it easier for employees to understand the feedback and goals
Improve the quality and effectiveness of employee and manager communication
One of the most common ways to structure performance evaluation examples is to use performance differentiation to sort employees into categories. This ensures that feedback is tied to performance and that employees are guided appropriately.
For example, managers can differentiate between top performers, solid performers, and those needing improvement.
Top Performer Example: "As the manager of the sales department, you helped the team achieve 95% of their sales target."
Solid Contributor Example: "You are consistently able to meet all your targets and quotas for the organization."
Improvement Needed Example: "While you met your targets, you struggled with certain projects or goals."
The most effective review examples are those that relate to measurable performance outcomes. This adds specificity and strength to the general comments made in the review.
For example, rather than simply noting that an employee met their goals, noting that the employee achieved 35% above the average team outcome provides further clarity.
There are several steps that a company's human resources professional can follow to write an employee's performance evaluation.
Review the past performance goals established for the employee
Review the achievements of the employee during the review period
Review the areas of the employee that need to be developed or improved upon during the upcoming review period
Establish new goals for the employee during the upcoming review period
One of the most important ways that a manager can align a performance evaluation with an employee's pay for performance is by establishing a connection between the two.
If an employee performs exceptionally well in the review period, they should be paid for that level of performance. Thus, by aligning these two components, companies will be able to motivate their employees according to their level of performance for the company.
A pay-for-performance compensation platform like CompAnalyst® enables organizations to directly link performance outcomes with competitive, data-driven salary decisions, improving both employee motivation and retention.
Merit increases and performance bonuses are directly influenced by the results of reviews. Individuals with high performance ratings will be rewarded with merit increases and performance bonuses.
Ensuring that performance reviews are conducted fairly and consistently will result in a more positive and trustworthy relationship between employees and the HR departments conducting the reviews.
Train the managers how to create reviews that are objective of the employees' performances.
Create guidelines for the reviews to ensure consistency in the evaluations of each employee.
Conduct calibration sessions between managers to ensure that all managers create reviews according to the same standards.
Ensure that all reviews use the same rating scales and metrics to evaluate the employees' performances.
Regularly monitor the review process to ensure that there is fairness and consistency in their creation.
Promote the transparency of the review process to the employees.
Rating calibration between managers and HR teams allows for a level of alignment to be established in the assessment and rating of employees. This reduces differences and promotes a sense of fairness in performance ratings.
Rater bias and performance inflation are significant risks to the performance review process. The best way to mitigate these risks is to provide training to raters on the bias that can influence the review.
Pay equity ensures that no employee is paid less than their performance would suggest. Pay equity ensures that the performance review and compensation process is fair and unbiased.
Pay equity analysis software like the Platform-PE helps organizations identify and correct compensation gaps, ensuring that performance outcomes are rewarded fairly and consistently.
Here are the common questions about the topic:
Avoid vague or personal comments that could demotivate employees. Steer clear of comparisons with colleagues or references to protected characteristics. Focus only on observable behaviors and business impact.
The majority of organizations will conduct reviews once a year. However, many organizations will also hold check-ins every quarter, or even more often.
During a negative review, the manager should approach the conversation with a positive tone and focus on finding solutions to the employee's problems.
A good review is one that is fair, specific, and focused on the future. The manager should provide clear opportunities for the employee to develop and succeed in their role.
Yes, reviews often play a key role in promotion decisions. Strong, consistent ratings combined with demonstrated leadership potential increase chances for advancement. Documented results provide the evidence leaders need.
The latest research, expert advice, and compensation best practices all in one place.
Blog
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Blog
Learn how to train managers for effective pay conversations and build trust.
Blog
Total rewards package flexibility lets employees choose what matters - pay, perks, and benefits tailored to their needs.