Blog
Get Pay Right on ADP Workforce Now® Next Gen™
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Written by Salary.com Staff
July 10, 2026
Many organizations struggle with effectively linking the output of their employees to their leadership. This article will cover for you how MBO works, how to write objectives for your employees, and how to link that output to an employee's pay.
Management by objectives (MBO) is a management framework that was first introduced by Peter Drucker in 1954. At it's core, MBO requires that managers and employees work together to define the objectives that they will achieve within a specified timeframe. MBO helps link an employee's performance with their pay.
The five components of MBO are:
| MBO component | What it means |
|---|---|
| Collaborative goal setting | Managers and employees define objectives together |
| Measurable outcomes | Every goal has quantifiable success criteria |
| Time bound targets | Each objective carries a specific deadline |
| Regular reviews | Performance is tracked through scheduled check ins |
| Performance linked rewards | Results directly influence compensation decisions |
Management by objectives is used as the backbone of the performance management system. Performance management systems require that each employee's output is linked to the company's overall goals and objectives. However, a survey in 2024 found that only 47% of employees in the United States feel that they know the expectations of their jobs. MBO was created to solve this problem.
Tools like Elevate® take this a step further by giving every employee a secure, personalized portal where they can view their pay, benefits, and career paths in one place. When employees clearly understand how they are compensated and where they can grow, they are better prepared to set meaningful objectives with their managers - which is the foundation of MBO.
Goal setting for management by objectives begins with the leaders of an organization creating three to five goals for the fiscal year. The goals are then broken down into department goals, and finally to individual employee goals. Each employee works together with their manager to create goals that are both challenging yet achievable.
Leadership creates three to five goals for the fiscal year
Department leaders create goals for their departments that contribute to the company's goals
Each employee and manager creates goals for the employee that contribute to the department's goals
All goals are agreed upon by the employee and their manager
All goals are documented for review
To create effective goals for employees within an organization, many companies encourage employees and managers to use the SMART framework for goal creation. SMART stands for specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, and time bound. Each goal within an MBO plan should incorporate these five components.
Specific - the goal should be specific about what must be accomplished by the employee.
Measurable - the goal should be able to be measured to determine if it has been accomplished.
Achievable - the goal should be challenging but able to still be accomplished by the employee.
Relevant - the goal should relate to the company's objectives and allow the employee to contribute to those objectives.
Time bound - the goal should have a deadline by which it is to be accomplished.
One of the main benefits of MBO is that it allows for individuals to understand how their goals relate to the company's goals. Additionally, a study in 2024 of organizations that used MBO found that these components of MBO played a significant role in enhancing the satisfaction and effectiveness of the employees within those organizations. An example of how individual and company goals can align is demonstrated in the following table:
| Alignment level | Example |
|---|---|
| Company goal | Grow annual revenue by 15% |
| Department goal | Increase enterprise pipeline by 20% in Q2 |
| Team goal | Generate 50 qualified leads per month |
| Individual goal | Book 12 discovery calls per week |
Strategic cascading is the process by which an organization's goals are broken down into smaller goals for each department and each employee. For example, if a company's sales manager aims to increase company revenue by 15% each fiscal year, that goal can be broken down into a goal for each sales department to aim for a certain percentage in relation to the company's goal. Each sales representative would then have a goal of achieving a certain number of sales within a timeframe.
For this cascading process to work, the underlying pay structure must be grounded in reliable market data. CompAnalyst® helps organizations build that foundation by benchmarking jobs against over 800 million HR-reported data points across 16,000+ job titles.
When salary ranges are set using accurate market data, the goals that cascade down to each employee can be tied to compensation decisions that are both competitive and defensible.
Performance appraisals for employees are made easier by the MBO framework. Since there are agreed upon objectives for each employee, the manager can simply assess the employee based on those objectives. For instance, employees will be rated against their set objectives, and the compensation for each employee will be linked to those appraisals. Additionally, the documentation that is created as part of the MBO framework works to protect the company in the case of legal issues.
Appraisals are made based upon the objectives that were established with each employee.
Employees are rated according to their accomplishment of their objectives.
Compensation for the employee is decided according to those appraisals.
Documentation of the MBO framework can protect the company from legal issues.
Managers review each employee's objectives to determine whether they are meeting their goals. Each employee will receive an overall rating that is determined by each objective's rating. Those ratings can range from levels that indicate that the employee is exceeding their goals to levels that indicate that they are failing to meet their objectives. An example of those rating levels is displayed in the following table:
| Rating level | What it means |
|---|---|
| Exceeds expectations | Surpassed the agreed upon target |
| Meets expectations | Fully delivered on the objective |
| Below expectations | Fell short of the documented target |
Employees that meet or exceed their objectives are rewarded with increases in their merit number or bonus award structure. Many companies create a merit matrix that determines the position of each employee according to their pay range. For instance, if an employee has a rating of "exceeds expectations," they could earn a merit increase of 10% of their salary, where as employees that earn "meets expectations" earn 5% merit increases.
Managing this process manually through spreadsheets can lead to errors and inconsistencies, especially across large teams. CompXL® automates the entire merit and bonus cycle by turning performance ratings directly into compensation actions.
Organizations can configure their merit matrices, bonus structures, commission plans, and equity awards within the platform so that once appraisals are finalized, the right pay decisions are calculated and distributed automatically — removing guesswork and ensuring that high performers are rewarded accurately and on time.
Here are the common questions about the management by objectives:
Companies with goals related to their customers may have their customer service departments create specific goals related to providing improved service or reducing response times for customers. For instance, the customer service manager may establish a goal that each agent should resolve 15 customer service tickets each day. Each agent may establish their own goal of resolving 5 tickets each hour.
Despite the growth of other performance management frameworks, such as OKRs, management by objectives is still extensively used by companies of all sizes. For example, a survey in 2025 found that a lack of clarity of expectations within the workplace is the weakest aspect of United States workplaces.
Here are the main advantages and disadvantages of MBO:
| Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|
| Increases goal clarity and accountability | Can become rigid if goals are not updated |
| Strengthens manager employee alignment | May overemphasize quantitative results |
| Creates a defensible basis for pay decisions | Requires significant time to set and track goals |
| Boosts engagement through participation | Risk of targets being too easy or too aggressive |
Most HR practitioners suggest that employees have three to five objectives established for them each year. Setting fewer than three objectives for each employee may make it difficult for them to measure their progress towards their goals. Similarly, if there are too many objectives for each employee, they may become overwhelmed and struggle to focus on attaining any of their objectives.
The latest research, expert advice, and compensation best practices all in one place.
Blog
Bringing trusted compensation intelligence and seamless planning to even more ADP users.
Blog
Learn how to train managers for effective pay conversations and build trust.
Blog
Total rewards package flexibility lets employees choose what matters - pay, perks, and benefits tailored to their needs.