As of December 01, 2024, the average annual pay of Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) in Kansas City, MO is $74,051. While Salary.com is seeing that Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) salary in Kansas City, MO can go up to $126,597 or down to $69,387, but most earn between $71,610 and $101,556. Salary.com shows the average base salary (core compensation), as well as the average total cash compensation for the job of Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) in the United States.
| Annual Salary |
Monthly Pay |
Weekly Pay |
Hourly Wage |
|
| 75th Percentile | $103,734 | $8,645 | $1,995 | $50 |
| Average | $75,640 | $6,303 | $1,455 | $36 |
| 25th Percentile | $73,146 | $6,095 | $1,407 | $35 |
An entry-level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) with under 1 year experience makes about $72,706. With less than 2 years of experience, a mid-level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) makes around $72,888. After 2-4 years, the Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) pay rises to about $73,251. Those senior Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) with 5-8 years of experience earn roughly $73,795, and those Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) having 8 years or more experience are expected to earn about $84,023 on average.
| Levels | Salary |
|---|---|
| Entry Level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) | $72,706 |
| Intermediate Level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) | $72,888 |
| Senior Level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) | $73,251 |
| Specialist Level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) | $73,795 |
| Expert Level Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) | $84,023 |
| Entry Level | 4% |
| Mid Level | 4% |
| Senior Level | 3% |
| Top Level | 2% |
| Experienced | 11% |
Not the salary data you are looking for? Choose the city salary you want to see.
Salary.com job board provides millions of Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) information for you to search for. Click on search button below to see Co-Pilot (Large Non-Jet) job openings or enter a new job title here.
Each competency has five to ten behavioral assertions that can be observed, each with a corresponding performance level (from one to five) that is required for a particular job.
Customer Service: Customer service is the provision of service to customers before, during and after a purchase. The perception of success of such interactions is dependent on employees "who can adjust themselves to the personality of the guest". Customer service concerns the priority an organization assigns to customer service relative to components such as product innovation and pricing. In this sense, an organization that values good customer service may spend more money in training employees than the average organization or may proactively interview customers for feedback. From the point of view of an overall sales process engineering effort, customer service plays an important role in an organization's ability to generate income and revenue. From that perspective, customer service should be included as part of an overall approach to systematic improvement. One good customer service experience can change the entire perception a customer holds towards the organization.
Transportation: Refers to the mode of travel used to get from home to work most frequently. The transportation are bus, train, aeroplane, ship, car, etc while the mode of transportation refers to road, air, sea/ocean, etc.
Continuous Improvement: A continual improvement process, also often called a continuous improvement process (abbreviated as CIP or CI), is an ongoing effort to improve products, services, or processes. These efforts can seek "incremental" improvement over time or "breakthrough" improvement all at once. Delivery (customer valued) processes are constantly evaluated and improved in the light of their efficiency, effectiveness and flexibility. Some see CIPs as a meta-process for most management systems (such as business process management, quality management, project management, and program management). W. Edwards Deming, a pioneer of the field, saw it as part of the 'system' whereby feedback from the process and customer were evaluated against organisational goals. The fact that it can be called a management process does not mean that it needs to be executed by 'management'; but rather merely that it makes decisions about the implementation of the delivery process and the design of the delivery process itself.
