1. What is the average salary of a Medical Records Research Coordinator?
The average annual salary of Medical Records Research Coordinator is $48,679.
In case you are finding an easy salary calculator,
the average hourly pay of Medical Records Research Coordinator is $23;
the average weekly pay of Medical Records Research Coordinator is $936;
the average monthly pay of Medical Records Research Coordinator is $4,057.
2. Where can a Medical Records Research Coordinator earn the most?
A Medical Records Research Coordinator's earning potential can vary widely depending on several factors, including location, industry, experience, education, and the specific employer.
According to the latest salary data by Salary.com, a Medical Records Research Coordinator earns the most in San Jose, CA, where the annual salary of a Medical Records Research Coordinator is $61,093.
3. What is the highest pay for Medical Records Research Coordinator?
The highest pay for Medical Records Research Coordinator is $63,144.
4. What is the lowest pay for Medical Records Research Coordinator?
The lowest pay for Medical Records Research Coordinator is $37,065.
5. What are the responsibilities of Medical Records Research Coordinator?
Medical Records Research Coordinator is responsible for organizing and overseeing the record keeping activities pertaining to releasing and retrieving medical records for research projects. Ensures all medical records are tracked and released according to HIPAA guidelines. Being a Medical Records Research Coordinator may require an associate degree or its equivalent. Typically reports to a supervisor or manager. The Medical Records Research Coordinator possesses a moderate understanding of general aspects of the job. Works under the close direction of senior personnel in the functional area. May require 0-1 year of general work experience.
6. What are the skills of Medical Records Research Coordinator
Specify the abilities and skills that a person needs in order to carry out the specified job duties. Each competency has five to ten behavioral assertions that can be observed, each with a corresponding performance level (from one to five) that is required for a particular job.
1.)
Insight: Insight is the understanding cause and effect based on the identification of relationships and behaviors within a model, context, or scenario.
2.)
Leadership Development: Leadership development expands the capacity of individuals to perform in leadership roles within organizations. Leadership roles are those that facilitate execution of a company’s strategy through building alignment, winning mindshare and growing the capabilities of others. Leadership roles may be formal, with the corresponding authority to make decisions and take responsibility, or they may be informal roles with little official authority (e.g., a member of a team who influences team engagement, purpose and direction; a lateral peer who must listen and negotiate through influence). Leadership development is thought to be key to business success. A study by the Center for Creative Leadership holds that 65 percent of companies with mature leadership development programs drove improved business results as compared to 6 percent of companies without such a program. Similarly, 86% of companies with leadership development programs responded rapidly to changing market conditions whereas only 52% of companies with immature programs were able to do so.
3.)
Due Diligence: Due diligence is the investigation or exercise of care that a reasonable business or person is expected to take before entering into an agreement or contract with another party, or an act with a certain standard of care. It can be a legal obligation, but the term will more commonly apply to voluntary investigations. A common example of due diligence in various industries is the process through which a potential acquirer evaluates a target company or its assets for an acquisition. The theory behind due diligence holds that performing this type of investigation contributes significantly to informed decision making by enhancing the amount and quality of information available to decision makers and by ensuring that this information is systematically used to deliberate in a reflexive manner on the decision at hand and all its costs, benefits, and risks.