Calibration and the Future of Employee Performance Reviews

Companies have been using calibration processes to evaluate employees for years. Managers gather to assess workers and assign them ratings based on undisclosed standards. Those who experienced it know how subjective and political it feels. The good news is that calibration may not be around for much longer. But is it for the better?

 The Pitfalls of Subjectivity in Performance Reviews

Performance reviews can be tricky. It is hard to judge and compare people fairly. Own biases and feelings often influence people’s opinions. Subjectivity in ratings and comparison can cause:

Bias and Unfair Assessments

Subjectivity in performance ratings can introduce biases based on personal preferences, stereotypes, or unconscious biases. Sometimes, managers can unconsciously let their own opinions affect how they rate employees. This leads to unfair comparisons and ratings. It can create unfair assessments and favoritism as well.

Inconsistencies Across Evaluators

When managers rate their employees, they use different standards and interpretations. This can cause problems when comparing employees' performances and making fair evaluations.

Recent Focus

Managers sometimes overlook your previous achievements and focus only on recent ones. This can make your overall evaluation unfair and not show how well you performed during the entire time they are assessing you. When trying to fix performance review discrepancies, using calibration may backfire. Managers often give more importance to the opinions of the loudest voices, leaving others unheard when discussing ratings.

It is hard to be fair and helpful when reviewing employees, and avoiding bias is tricky. Some people think of giving more frequent feedback and coaching instead of reviews. The trick is using technology to help remove bias, not make it worse.

Leveling and Grounding the Performance Rating Curve

Many companies rely on calibration during performance reviews to level the playing field.  Some companies may have ditched old-school calibration practices, but aligning performance expectations remain essential.  Are there other ways to achieve the same goals aside from calibration? Here are some pros and cons of ending calibration in performance management:

Pros

Increased Individual Fairness:

Without calibration, employees may receive evaluations based solely on their performance. This method reduces biases during calibration.

Greater Manager Autonomy:

Removing calibration gives managers more flexibility to assess their team's unique performance. This independence can help managers make better decisions for their team.

Simplified Process:

It is easier to evaluate your performance without having to schedule extra meetings or negotiate with other teams to align ratings. This saves time and resources for everyone.

Cons

Risk of Inconsistency:

Performance evaluations may vary across teams or managers when  there is no calibration. This leads to unfairness in the performance management system.

Potential for Managerial Bias:

Managers may have biases in their evaluations. This can lower their motivation and result in differences in pay and opportunities for career advancement. Calibration sessions provide checks and balances to ensure fair assessments.

Loss of Comparative Insights:

Calibration helps everyone agree on what excellent work looks like. When  these meetings do not happen, evaluations may  differ, and knowing what to expect from workers will  be hard.

Calibration tries to be fair, but it may make performance reviews less meaningful and demotivate top performers. Companies need to think whether  calibration remains  worth it. Performance management is changing fast, so old-school methods such as calibration  may not last.

Aligning on Great Performance

A key part of revamping performance reviews is getting managers and HR on the same page about what “great performance” means. Without alignment, reviews are subjective and open to bias.

1. To calibrate, bring managers and HR together to discuss examples of great work from different roles.
2. Discuss specific behaviors and outcomes that made the work great.
3. Look for common themes and determine 3-5 attributes you all agree to make up excellent performance, such as:
   • Exceeding goals and KPIs consistently and ethically.
   • Creating new and creative ways to solve difficult issues.
   • Displaying strong communication and interpersonal skills.
   • Continuously improving and developing new skills.
   • Demonstrating leadership abilities and positively influencing others.
4. These attributes will form your shared understanding of great performance. Use them to create detailed performance levels.

To ensure performance reviews are fair and consistent, reviewing and sharing examples of great work regularly is important. This helps everyone stay on the same page and work towards the same goals.

The New Practices of Performance Management

Performance management is evolving, and the days of traditional annual reviews and ratings seem numbered. More and more companies are moving away from the annual review process in favor of continuous feedback and coaching. Some of the new approaches gaining popularity include:

Regular check-ins

Managers meet with employees regularly. They discuss progress, provide feedback, and make sure everyone is on the same page about priorities and goals.

Performance improvement plans

Companies develop specific plans to help struggling employees get back on track. This includes clear steps and timelines to measure progress.

Anonymous feedback

Companies use anonymous surveys for honest feedback from employees without fear of retaliation.

They are shifting from annual performance reviews to more continuous and personalized practices.

Performance Management Software

Technology plays a big part in performance management. Performance management software simplifies the process. It can track goals and provide a centralized platform for continuous and efficient feedback and performance data.

Companies remain to use calibrated compensation decisions. Performance reviews are becoming more continuous instead of just once a year.

Conclusion

Companies are getting smarter and realizing that making employees compete is not good for anyone. Instead, they are trying new ways of giving feedback, coaching, and self-evaluating to help people develop and grow. The old way of ranking and rating people is going out of style. The future is about working together, giving feedback, and focusing on people's strengths and needs. So, be open to changes in your performance review because it is all about helping you be your best self.

Visit Salary.com and check out a wide range of products and services to help you with your performance evaluations.